...para que os vayáis ambientando....mirad esta maravilla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-G_CaEIfH8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-G_CaEIfH8
domingo, 30 de abril de 2017
sábado, 29 de abril de 2017
La Pascua en Ukraina, cortesía de Salvador de Pedro Buendia.
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-un-vuelo.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-el-dia-grande-y.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua2017-en-ucrania-iii-la.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-iv-reunion.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-cuando-se-siente.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-vi-pulsando-la.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-el-dia-grande-y.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua2017-en-ucrania-iii-la.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-iv-reunion.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-cuando-se-siente.html
https://deacaparaaculla.blogspot.com.es/2017/04/pascua-2017-en-ucrania-vi-pulsando-la.html
Asi van los rusos a celebrar el Dia de la Victoria....¡¡¡que envidia!!!
Se acerca el Dia de la Victoria en la Gran Guerra Patria...que pena de país..me refiero al nuestro...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlZBxhZ2kH8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDJa1mGtDy8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoPzzAkGyLg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlZBxhZ2kH8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDJa1mGtDy8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoPzzAkGyLg
jueves, 27 de abril de 2017
martes, 25 de abril de 2017
¿Por qué queremos seguirnos destrozando?
Somos una máquina de crear guerras..¿Ahora Corea?¿Quien creó el paralelo 38 dividiendo al país? ¿Tenemos todos Alzhaeimer?¿Hay razones objetivas para crear otra foco de tensión bélica? Y mientras tanto Ukraina duerme...
https://mundo.sputniknews.com/asia/201704251068635523-corea-peninsula-temsion-submarinos/
https://mundo.sputniknews.com/asia/201704251068635523-corea-peninsula-temsion-submarinos/
lunes, 24 de abril de 2017
jueves, 20 de abril de 2017
Las mejores fotos aéreas del mundo mundial...varias de Moscú
Sin comentarios...solo disfrutar de la visión...
https://mundo.sputniknews.com/foto/201704191068473932-airpano-imagenes-panoramicas/
https://mundo.sputniknews.com/foto/201704191068473932-airpano-imagenes-panoramicas/
miércoles, 19 de abril de 2017
Mis libros...mi punto de vista sobre Rusia, la URSS, el espacio post soviético...
Dedicado a un presunto compañero que me recomendó leer algo sobre Rusia...y lo hizo en un foro...
https://spanishriot.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/356/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blSIz-gug4s
Y falta uno..."Ámbar" que espero vea la luz para que os lo lleveis de vacaciones...
viernes, 14 de abril de 2017
¿Qui prodit?
Conozco a mas de quince militares españoles de graduación alta, entre los que me incluyo, que creen que el ataque con gas sarin en Siria es un puro montaje en el que nada tiene que ver Al Assad y hay varias razones para pensarlo así.
La primera es que con toda la comunidad internacional en contra y con la prensa mundial jugando a estrategas de pacotilla solo podría perder una guerra que va ganando...nada que ganar, mucho que perder. Del Presidente sirio se podrá decir cualquier cosa menos que es bobo...¿Que ganaría con un ataque así sobre su propia población civil?
Otra cuestión sería que las fragatas que lanzaron los misiles en represalia salieron de Rota (España y había pensado ponerlo en interrogación dadas las condiciones en que se ha alquilado esta base...) antes del supuesto ataque...
No menos cierto es la cuestión de que nadie ha podido demostrar quien ha lanzado el famoso gas, y anteriormente, hace dos años como poco, ya hubo otro ataque en el que los supuestos técnicos de la ONU tampoco pudieron determinar quien lo lanzó...
Se alude a que Turquía afirma que se trata de gas sarin y será cierto, no digo que no, pero se omite que según Siria, el gas llegó a su destino procedente de Turquía...
Si parece muy cierto que la escasa popularidad de Trump en su país le obliga a grandes golpes de efecto para retomarla en niveles semejantes a los de su elección por lo menos pero bien es cierto también que la escalada de violencia emprendida, no solo en Siria, le pone en manos de sus halcones que a su vez son rehenes del lobby del armamento en el que lleva mucho retraso sobre Rusia porque no han podido testar en combate la eficacia a los posibles compradores, algo imprescindible en este negocio.Nadie puede vender armamento que no tiene comprobada su eficacia sobre el campo de batalla.
El único beneficiado de esta basura es el DAESH que se frota las manos viendo como sus enemigos se pelean entre ellos.¿Qui prodit?
El desquicie de Trump es tan grande como para justificar las acciones con argumentos peregrinos, eludiendo comentar que es un ataque ilegal por carecer de mandato de la ONU y hasta sus asesores, novatos ellos, llegan a matizar que ni Hitler empleó el gas contra su pueblo...¿No eran alemanes los judíos exterminados CON GAS ?
En todo esto hay algo que no consigo entender...admitiendo que la URSS cometió grandisimos crimenes por supuesto no alcanza mi razón a entender como a Alemania y la dulce Austria se la han perdonado los suyos, no comprendo por qué a todos se les ha olvidado el genocidio armenio a manos de los turcos y un largo etc...Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresde... el napal de Vietnam ...y a los rusos nada de nada ni desde la razón ni desde la creencia de que todos los errores por crueles que sean no los deben de pagar ni todos ni mucho menos los hijos de quienes los cometieron..ni los nietos...ni los bisnietos...
Y si tan seguro está el sr. Trump de haber obrado bien ¿Por qué no quiere que se cree una comisión para investigar lo sucedido como propone Rusia?
Señor Trump acaba usted de retomar el papel de sheriff matón de sus peliculas en las que masacraron a los indigenas mientras la mayor fábrica de propaganda jamás montada, Hollywood, lo convertía todo en una epopeya y ¿sabe lo peor? que siempre creí en la bondad de los pueblos por encima de sus gobernantes con lo que muchas veces, demasiadas , los confundimos, y ya no creo...
Se alude a que Turquía afirma que se trata de gas sarin y será cierto, no digo que no, pero se omite que según Siria, el gas llegó a su destino procedente de Turquía...
Si parece muy cierto que la escasa popularidad de Trump en su país le obliga a grandes golpes de efecto para retomarla en niveles semejantes a los de su elección por lo menos pero bien es cierto también que la escalada de violencia emprendida, no solo en Siria, le pone en manos de sus halcones que a su vez son rehenes del lobby del armamento en el que lleva mucho retraso sobre Rusia porque no han podido testar en combate la eficacia a los posibles compradores, algo imprescindible en este negocio.Nadie puede vender armamento que no tiene comprobada su eficacia sobre el campo de batalla.
El único beneficiado de esta basura es el DAESH que se frota las manos viendo como sus enemigos se pelean entre ellos.¿Qui prodit?
El desquicie de Trump es tan grande como para justificar las acciones con argumentos peregrinos, eludiendo comentar que es un ataque ilegal por carecer de mandato de la ONU y hasta sus asesores, novatos ellos, llegan a matizar que ni Hitler empleó el gas contra su pueblo...¿No eran alemanes los judíos exterminados CON GAS ?
En todo esto hay algo que no consigo entender...admitiendo que la URSS cometió grandisimos crimenes por supuesto no alcanza mi razón a entender como a Alemania y la dulce Austria se la han perdonado los suyos, no comprendo por qué a todos se les ha olvidado el genocidio armenio a manos de los turcos y un largo etc...Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresde... el napal de Vietnam ...y a los rusos nada de nada ni desde la razón ni desde la creencia de que todos los errores por crueles que sean no los deben de pagar ni todos ni mucho menos los hijos de quienes los cometieron..ni los nietos...ni los bisnietos...
Y si tan seguro está el sr. Trump de haber obrado bien ¿Por qué no quiere que se cree una comisión para investigar lo sucedido como propone Rusia?
Señor Trump acaba usted de retomar el papel de sheriff matón de sus peliculas en las que masacraron a los indigenas mientras la mayor fábrica de propaganda jamás montada, Hollywood, lo convertía todo en una epopeya y ¿sabe lo peor? que siempre creí en la bondad de los pueblos por encima de sus gobernantes con lo que muchas veces, demasiadas , los confundimos, y ya no creo...
jueves, 13 de abril de 2017
martes, 11 de abril de 2017
Un curioso documento:la homilia del Obispo Tikhon de Yegorievsk el dia de la abdicación del Zar Nicolás II
Homélie de l’évêque Tikhon de Yegorevsk, prononcée à
l’occasion de la première liturgie devant la nouvelle église des néomartyrs et
confesseurs de Russie, le jour de l’abdication du tsar-martyr Nicolas II
on 17 March 2017
Nous publions ci-après in extenso l’homélie
de l’évêque Tikhon de Yegorevsk, supérieur du monastère Sretensky, prononcée le
15 mars, à l’occasion de la première liturgie devant la nouvelle église des
néomartyrs et confesseurs de Russie : « Nous savons que ce jour est
particulier. C’est le jour où la Reine du Ciel, nous a donné le signe de Son
icône « Souveraine » et a pris de façon providentielle le sceptre du
pouvoir sur notre Patrie, sur la Russie, lequel est tombé des mains du dernier
représentant de la dynastie tricentenaire, le saint martyr Nicolas II. Lorsque
nous avons commencé à ériger cette église, nous avons prié afin que le Seigneur
nous bénisse pour achever ce travail précisément ce jour, le centenaire du
commencement des événements les plus tragiques, peut-être, qu’ait connu notre
Patrie. C’est le commencement de ce chemin des épreuves que, par la miséricorde
de Dieu, notre peuple a surmonté, ces épreuves qui ne l’ont pas brisé et qui
ont amené au Christ, à la victoire de la Résurrection du Christ, les
descendants de beaucoup de ceux qui, à un certain moment, avaient apostasié.
L’église est dédiée à la Résurrection du Christ qui triomphe de tout, et aux
fidèles disciples du Seigneur Jésus-Christ, c’est-à-dire Ses saints Néomartyrs
et Confesseurs. Le Seigneur a accompli le souhait de notre cœur. Et voici
qu’aujourd’hui, en cette date anniversaire, importante au moins par le fait que
nous réfléchissons à la voie parcourue par notre pays et notre peuple, nous
prêtons l’oreille aux leçons que nous devons tirer et nous comprenons le principal :
tout se trouve dans les mains de Dieu seulement. Le Seigneur fait descendre aux
enfers et en fait remonter. C’est ce qui s’est produit aussi avec notre Patrie,
descendue aux enfers et remontée vers la Résurrection du Christ, la
résurrection de la vie en Dieu pour des millions de nos compatriotes. Les
leçons de Dieu sont parfois très lourdes. Les leçons de Dieu résident encore
dans le fait que l’insouciance, la pusillanimité, l’infidélité des hommes sont
supportées longtemps par Lui, mais arrive ensuite la minute lors de laquelle
les plus insouciants et leurs descendants doivent expier par une épreuve amère,
mais salvatrice. Nous commémorons aujourd’hui les saints Néomartyrs, mais nous
ne savons pas combien il y a eu de martyrs de l’ombre, qui à un certain moment
ont renié l’Église et la foi, mais grâce aux épreuves et la voie du martyre
sont revenus au Christ, peut-être durant les dernières minutes. Ils sont revenus et ont découvert le sens et le but de toute leur vie,
l’union avec Dieu, l’union avec le Christ. Cela s’est produit de la même façon
que sur le Golgotha avec le larron : se trouvant sur la croix, il a fait
au dernier moment ce qui lui était possible, il prononça de tout cœur seulement
quelques mots : « Souviens-Toi de moi, Seigneur, dans Ton
Royaume ». Il n’a eu dans sa vie aucun labeur spirituel, aucune piété toute sa vie
durant. Seulement les péchés d’abandon, de trahison, de lâcheté et de
tromperie, selon l’expression de l’empereur Nicolas Alexandrovitch. C’est la
même chose que, probablement, de nombreux compatriotes pouvaient dire
d’eux-mêmes : ils étaient coupables de trahison, de lâcheté et de
tromperie. À l’égard de l’Église, du Seigneur, il s’agissait de la voie
historique de la Russie orthodoxe, la voie qu’ils connaissaient, mais qu’ils
ont négligée. Ce sont des leçons pratiques pour nous tous. Nous fêtons la
gloire des saints Néomartyrs, vilipendés et rejetés par ce siècle, ridiculisés
et torturés par leurs contemporains. Notre mémoire, c’est comme une sorte
d’icône, ici sur terre, de ce qui se produit dans le Royaume céleste. Notre
mémoire, n’est qu’un petit éclat de la gloire que ces hommes ont dans le
Royaume des cieux. Ils étaient peu nombreux, mais ils avaient précisément
raison, ils ont choisi précisément la véritable voie, parce qu’ils ont choisie
la Voie, la Vérité et la Vie – le Christ. Malgré cela, il semblait que tout,
autour d’eux, leur criait : « Quittez-Le ! Laissez-Le – et vous
vivrez ». Et eux disaient autre
chose : « Cherchons Dieu, et notre âme vivra » (cf. Ps. 68,33).
C’est une haute leçon spirituelle. Mais il y a aussi une leçon pratique. Elle
ne vient pas des saints Pères, ni des grands ascètes, elle nous est enseignée
par des contemporains, qui regardaient les événements depuis l’extérieur, en
1917. L’un d’entre eux n’était pas orthodoxe, je ne sais même pas s’il était
chrétien, il s’agit de l’ambassadeur de France à Petrograd, Maurice Paléologue,
qui disait : « C’est étonnant, je ne connais pas d’autre peuple plus
influençable que le peuple russe ». Ces gens qui saluaient le
renversement de l’autocratie, convaincus de la justesse de leurs actes,
s’écriaient avec enthousiasme : « Hourra ! » (c’est le mot
séculier pour « Hosanna »), de même qu’ils persuadaient tous et
eux-mêmes qu’enfin tout changerait, que viendraient les gens les plus dignes,
que commencerait le royaume du bonheur et de la justice. Quelques mois après,
les mêmes personnes étaient horrifiés et pleuraient avec des larmes de sang,
parce que le pays qu’ils avaient remis eux-mêmes à ceux qui étaient les plus
dignes et qui avaient été élus, s’effondrait. Vers l’été 1917 déjà, il n’y
avait pratiquement plus de Russie, voilà ce qu’en ont fait ceux qui avaient
frénétiquement brigué le pouvoir, qui affirmaient avec suffisance et croyaient
fermement qu’ils savaient comment faire mieux. Il s’est avéré que diriger
l’État russe était plus que difficile. Le pays s’effondrait et tombait dans les
mains de l’antichrist, de ses précurseurs. Qui a transmis la Russie et son
peuple aux mains de ces précurseurs ? – Ceux qui aimaient infiniment la
Russie, comme ils le disaient. Et il faut dire qu’ils ne mentaient pas. Tous
ces acteurs du complot ignoble – et les militaires, et les aristocrates, et les
membres de la douma, et l’intelligentsia, et le peuple, criaient partout :
nous faisons cela pour la Russie ! Nous sommes prêts à mourir pour
elle ! Et, par la suite, ils ont prouvé leur amour parfois par leur mort
même, dans l’armée blanche. Mais voici qu’en définitive ce sont précisément ces
gens qui aimaient infiniment la Russie qui ont livré le pays aux mains de cet
homme qui a déclaré : « Mes bons messieurs, je crache sur la
Russie ! » Ces mots appartiennent à celui dont le corps gît encore
aujourd’hui sur la Place Rouge. Voici ce qu’ont fait, avec grand amour pour la
Patrie, ceux que l’on qualifiait alors d’espoir et de meilleurs hommes du pays.
Ces leçons doivent s’imprimer dans notre esprit et dans notre cœur. Nous ne
pouvons permettre à nouveau quelque chose de semblable. Maintenant, Dieu merci,
les conditions préalables à pareille chose sont absentes. Mais, en un clin
d’œil tout peut changer si les membres de l’Église du Christ ne le sont qu’en
apparence. C’est alors que l’Esprit de Dieu les quittera. Et aujourd’hui, en ce soir
magnifique, remarquable, de la Table du Seigneur, prions afin que le Seigneur
ne nous laisse pas entrer en tentation, qu’Il nous délivre du malin, qu’Il nous
préserve, nous le petit troupeau de Son Église. Afin que dans cette église en
l’honneur des Néomartyrs, souhaitée et construite par nous tous, nous puissions
durant de nombreuses années célébrer la Table du Seigneur. Afin que vos enfants
et vos petits-enfants la célèbrent ici. Je voudrais vous remercier tous, au nom
de toute la fraternité de notre monastère, pour la prière d’aujourd’hui. Je voudrais
remercier la fraternité de notre monastère elle-même pour ses labeurs, pour la
construction et l’aménagement de cette église. Je voudrais exprimer des paroles
de reconnaissance à tous les constructeurs, architectes, aux remarquables
artistes, aux ingénieurs. Je vous remercie vous tous pour avoir pu nous
permettre, par vos labeurs et vos prières, de célébrer un office aussi
extraordinaire. Probablement, ce n’est pas un hasard. Le premier office, ici au
Monastère Sretensky, le jour de la fête de la Rencontre du Seigneur, en 1994,
s’est produit également dans la rue, nous nous en rappelons. De même, le
premier office devant la nouvelle église, se déroule, non pas à dessein, mais
comme les choses l’ont voulu, en plein air, dans la grande église du monde Divin,
dans lequel nous vivons tous. Je voudrais remercier également le chœur et tous
les étudiants, puis encore une fois, tous nos paroissiens. Que Dieu vous aide,
vous renforce dans la foi, et que la Reine du Ciel vous protège. Amen ».
lunes, 10 de abril de 2017
Una interpretación sobre Ukraina del Tte. General Reshetnikov: El retorno del Imperio
Dadle al tarductor que para eso le he puesto...
General Reshetnikov: Return to
the Empire (superbly controversial interview)
Foreword by the
Saker: Today I
am posting a really interesting interview which will sound absolutely
outlandish to a lot of you. Get this: the person interviewed is a former
KGB General who speaks about restoring the monarchy under the rule of
Jesus-Christ! And when I say “KGB General” I am being just as dishonest
as the western media when it writes about Putin being a KGB officer.
Technically speaking, yes, both Putin and Reshetnikov were in the KGB and they
had the little red id card which did say “KGB USSR”. But in reality both
were part of the KGB’s Foreign Intelligence Service, the First Chief
Directorate (PGU) of the KGB, a completely separate branch of the KGB which
even had its own, separate, headquarters in Yasenevo District in the southwest
of Moscow. The First Chief Directorate (in Russian PGU KGB SSSR) did not
deal with dissent, crime, or all the other security functions of the rest of
the KGB. The PGU dealt with foreign intelligence exclusively (after the
end of the Soviet Union the PGU was kept independent and renamed “SVR” or
“Foreign Intelligence Service). And it was beyond any doubt the elite,
most capable, part of the KGB: only the very best were accepted there. As
for Reshetnikov, he was a top level officer responsible for an analytical
Department (in Russian “Head of an informational-analytical Department”).
In other words, the guys is exceptionally intelligent
and exceptionally well-educated. One of the best
analysts in Russia. And yet he speaks of monarchy and putting Christ in
power. And he lumps Communists and Liberal into one group. How do you
figure that one out? You can dismiss him as senile, but if that is the
case, his senility manifests itself in a curious way. Besides, having
seen his interviews, I can tell you that he is not senile one bit. A
clown trying to make statements to be noticed? There are not many clowns
in the PGU, even less with a rank of Lieutenant-General (that means a
“three-star” general). I won’t give you my explanation, I think that I
much rather leave you with a question mark and let you ponder this weird
phenomenon. I will just say one thing: to me the views of Reshetnikov are
yet another solid indicator that Russia is most definitely not part of Europe,
at least not culturally. I won’t say more :-P Now meet our rather
most interesting character!
General
Reshetnikov: Return to the Empire
by Lieutenant-General Leonid Petrovich Reshetnikov
Translated by Eugenia
Donbass these
days is suffering under horrific artillery fire. The Ukrainian forces are
maniacally firing at Donetsk, Yasinovataya, Makeevka and other cities from MLSR
and howitzers. There are many wounded; civilians are being killed, houses,
schools and hospitals destroyed. This bloody spectacle is organized by the Kiev
junta, which ignores all calls to stop this war, instead purposefully
committing genocide of the population of the Donetsk and Lugansk Republics.
When and how
will this horror end? What is the meaning of this all? What are the prospects
of LPR/DPR and/or Novorossiya? And, finally, is there a way to rebuild the
Great Russian Empire? We addressed these questions to the former head of the
Analytic Division of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian
Federation, then the Director of the Russian Institute of Strategic Studies, a
currently the President of the society “Two-Headed Eagle” – Leonid Petrovich
Reshetnikov.
Q: Donetsk and other cities of Novorossiya are under fire as we
speak; the Ukrainian military are attempting to breach the front at multiple
points. Why now and what is the cause of this escalation of the conflict?
A: This is a planned operation. The goal of the Kiev
regime is to complicate the relations between Russia and the US. Currently, the
relationship between the leadership of Russia and the new leadership of the USA
is generally favorable for us. Kiev is scared; it is afraid that Ukraine will
no longer be of interest to the United States and personally to Trump. For that
reason, everything was planned in a way that the official visit of Poroshenko
to Germany had to be interrupted because of the situation in Donbass aggravated
by the Ukrainian side. We cannot exclude that Merkel was a co-conspirator in
this; possibly, she herself initiated that action to undermine the
Russian-American negotiations. The fear of Europe is no less than the fear of
Ukraine. If the relations between Russia and US improve – Europe would be left
out in the cold. Thus, on the initiative of some European politicians the Kiev
criminals are murdering the civilians in Donetsk and Lugansk Republics in order
to attain their chimeric foreign policy goals. They are attempting by such
means to save their regime, to prove their usefulness. However, they are
unlikely to succeed in preventing the improvement in the relations between
Russia and the US.
The Kiev scum – Poroshenko, Parubiy and others – have
built such a reputations for themselves on the war against their own people
that they will certainly come to a sticky end. The best option – to flee
abroad, otherwise they will pay dearly. I believe the Kremlin understands
perfectly that the Kiev authorities are not partners but criminals that usurped
power, and no negotiations with them are possible. I want to emphasize: the
Kiev regime is doomed, and no provocations, no amount of artillery fire at
Donetsk and other cities, no attempts at offensives will accomplish anything
for Poroshenko and Co, except yet another brand mark on the foreheads of these
scoundrels.
Leonid
Petrovich, you were for a long time the Head of the Russian Institute of
Strategic Studies. The Institute essentially laid the theoretical groundwork
for the “Project Novorossiya”, which today the authorities in Russia and
Donbass republics prefer not to mention. At the same time, the ordinary Donbass
people became convinced that Novorossiya will not happen, and they will end up
with nothing but a territorial fragment like the two Donbass Republics. In such
case – without reunification with Russia via referendum – our future looks
bleak . . .
Novorossiya was not created as some theoretical
project; it was born through an explosion of the Russian historic self-awareness;
an explosion unexpected for all – including Moscow, the Kremlin, the Russian
public. Something that is hidden in the sub-consciousness in all of us – the
yearning for the recreation of the Orthodox Russian Empire. Many have not yet
realized what is Novorossiya, why it created such an enthusiasm in the society
and why so many people went to defend it even at the cost of their own lives.
That is because the idea of the Russian unity has survived under the layer of
the dead ideology of the last hundred years. Why, then, the “project
Novorossiya” wound down? I believe the reason is not only that some high
ranking officials disapprove of it and closed it down (although that happened,
too), but the main reason is that such project cannot be based on the Red Star:
then that would not be Novorossiya, the resurrection of Russia, but an
imitation of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, many in the political leadership
and expert community returned to the Soviet paradigms of 1970-1980s of the last
century. Those paradigms have shown their ineffectiveness long ago, and
attempts to reuse them now could lead to the collapse of everything. Old Soviet
schemes aren’t viable but the new ones – not Soviet, but liberal – have not
been taken on by the majority, so for now there is no ideological foundation
for Novorossiya . . .
History is moving along a spiral; repeats are possible
only on a new basis. So, at the present turn of the historic development, the
spirit of Novorossiya that broke through the ideological layers had to retreat
temporarily. The politicians as well as ordinary people had insufficient
understanding of what NOVOROSSIYA is, where are its historical roots and what
is its true spiritual meaning. I do not agree that the project is dead; it is
alive and will yet return. But! Only on one condition: if we ourselves realize
what path our country has travelled on for the past hundred years.
The return of
LPR/DPR to Ukraine with the special status, isn’t it done for the purpose, as
many suppose, to transform Ukraine from the inside, to convert it into a
pro-Russian entity? What do you think the near future holds for the Republics?
People that are surviving for the third years under the fire of the Ukrainian
military are demanding a clear answer to this question . . .
There are different opinions in the Kremlin, but no
definitive decision: to surrender Donbass to Ukraine. Yes, there are people
that indeed think this way and want to do this. However, there are others that
believe we should not leave people of Ukraine that have not accepted the Nazi
regime to the mercy of Kiev. My personal impression: our President does not
want to unconditionally surrender to Ukraine the people that lived through a
war, privations and suffering, so that these people would be subjected to
severe repressions, which is inevitable if Donbass is returned to Ukraine.
The problem is that Kiev shows no real changes in its
treatment of Donbass or relations to the Russian Federation, and I do not see
any prospects in the near future for any changes favorable to us. That regime,
in spite of its rotten nature, will be persisting for some time, because there
are still enough people that worked for decades to bring about such a regime;
they are bound by blood; they took power and have no intentions of
relinquishing it. The resistance to the regime is disorganized, lack the
nationalistic Idea, not specifically Ukrainian but common for our entire huge
country, our specific civilization. During the Soviet period the people were
brainwashed in a special way. Everything was done to make people believe that
Ukraine is an independent country.
I lived and studied in Kharkov and remember how it
was. At the local level, all the time the Soviet authorities were instilling
the idea: although we live in one country, but Moscow, the central Russia is
somewhere far away, and we are separate, we have our own history and our own
heroes. The people were taught that way – what do we expect now? It is natural
that in Donbass, Odessa, Crimea and other regions Russian spirit still remains
– during the 70 Soviet years and 25 years of independence the transformation
has not entirely succeeded. The Russian historic self-awareness persisted, as
did the feeling of belonging to the same civilization of all people that lived
on the territory of the Russian Empire. All this is still there, particularly
in the Eastern Ukraine. That is why the Ukrainian nationalists failed to fully
accomplish their project.
Starting from 1921, forced Ukrainization of the
Russian regions was taking place, specifically, of the territory of the Great
Don Cossack Army and Slobozhanshchina, incorporated by the order of Lenin and
Stalin into Ukraine. At some point, the town with the “romantic” name Mines
(earlier Alersandrovsk-Grushevsky) and Taganrog were also given to Ukraine.
Later, however, the common sense prevailed, and the towns were returned to
Russia. I don’t even want to remind about Crimea gifted to Ukraine by our
restless Nikita Khrushchev. Nobody really wants to remember that or think about
it; everybody starts the count from 1991. My dear friends, come on! The
groundwork for the breakdown of the Soviet Union was laid in 1917 and later in
1920-30s. During the Soviet time, governments, flags, hymns, national heroes
were invented; monuments to open Russophobes were built. Hence the explosion.
The 1991 was the result of the Soviet policies, remember that, comrades with
the red stars on their cap that I have seen in LPR . . . Your ancestors, your
leaders that you revere created the conditions for the breakdown of the united
country. What kind of Novorossiya could you create if you do
not learn lessons from history?
Leonid
Petrovich, at present there two peoples in Ukraine: the first is completely
anti-Russian, totally different from us in its mentality, and the second –
Russian, even if the representatives of this group call themselves Ukrainians,
due to upbringing and stereotypes. In reality, they are essentially deeply
Russian people. The division is along the civilization-mentality lines, the
same as between Serbs and Croats. Nevertheless, in the Kremlin as well as in
the Moscow expert community the dominant view is that the majority of the
Ukrainian population is just temporarily misled, brainwashed by the propaganda.
That is to say, we will use political technologies to break the spell; they
will again recall that they are Russians – and everything will be peaceful like
it was before. But at least half of the Ukrainian population has long time ago
turned into a different nation. What do we do with them, how do we reconcile
irreconcilable differences?
As a former (until 1974) resident of Ukraine, I
generally agree with you opinion. That division existed even then: when you
cross Dnepr river, on the other bank not everyone, but the majority looked like
a different nation. The wife of my elder brother from the Poltava region and
speaking the Malorossian dialect (the Poltava region, a part of historic Malorossiya, is on the left bank of
the Dnepr neighboring the Kharkov and Dneptopetrovsk regions; Malorossiya (Poltava,
Chernigov, Kirovograd), or Small Russia, together with Novorossiya (Odessa,
Nikolaev, Kherson, Donbass) or New Russia, and Sloboshanshchina (Kharkov
region), are historic names for territories of the Eastern Ukraine; in the
Soviet period, the Poltava dialect was taken as a foundation for the
development of the standard Ukrainian language – translator’s note) used to say about the speech of the people from the trans-Dnepr region:
”I do not understand their nice language. . . “ She is saying the same thing
now. I agree that the inhabitants of the Western Ukraine were strongly
influenced mentally and religiously by the Uniate and Catholic religions.
Apparently, the fact that genetically the Western Ukrainians are linked to the
leftovers of the Khazar Khanate also plays a significant role. Their mentality
has a complex origin, and indeed today they are largely a different nation,
although among them there are still people close to us in spirit. After all,
the Russianness is not determined by the blood but by the mindset. Possibly, in
the future there will be two different territories, two different states for
these two peoples.
At his time, the Foreign Minister of the Russian
Empire Khvostov wrote to the Tzar that Galicia should not be included into the Empire,
since it was a completely alien element. Thus, the awareness of the deep
difference was present then, and that difference should be taken into account
in the future. It seems, they are a different nation. Croats and Serbs come to
mind: there is little difference between the Serbian and Croatian languages –
100-200 words and slightly different pronunciation of a few sounds, which means
this is essentially the same language. However, the mental differences make
them two different nations, as do the difference in religion – Catholics and
Orthodox – and in the origin and development of these nations.
That is why it is important to realize that we will
not be able to rid them from the illusions – they are a different nation.
Although some do, I repeat, harbor delusions in that regard – Kremlin is large,
there are people with diverse opinions there, but there are also people who
understand perfectly that two distinct nations inhabit the present day Ukraine.
We have to understand that the problem cannot be solved
in one or two-three years; this is a long-term problem. The opportunities for
working with the population of the Western Ukraine, the southern regions of
Malorossiya are extensive. I am convinced that the “project Novorossiya” will
be revived – this is our historic, spiritual project. In order to prevent that
project from developing further, an unexpected weapon is currently employed –
an imitation of the Soviet project.
You mean the
idea embraced by some political analysts that “we in the end will return the
whole of Ukraine”?
No, I speak about Novorossya proper, the eight
South-Eastern regions of the present day Ukraine. Whatever idea someone
embraces – it’s his business. In the leadership of our country and in the
government there are enough people who understand that realistically we could
only think about the project Novorossiya. To return the entire Ukraine – this
is a fairy tale. Such idea shows either a total lack of understanding of the
real processes or a disinclination to work towards a realistic goal justifying
the inaction by the assertion that some day we will accomplish a much grander
task of getting back the whole of Ukraine.
People that have still failed to understand what was
happening with us during 73 years should not feel offended. These are all the
rudiments of the Soviet style of thinking when the national factor was
neglected, and as a result we got outbreaks of nationalism/separatism all over
the territory of our civilization. I remember two main Soviet postulates. In
1988, when I was a junior official, I was delivering a talk to the leadership
of the Foreign Intelligence Service, and the Chief of the Service Vladimir
Aleksandrovich Kryutchkov said to me: “The Baltic countries will never get away
from us, because . . . “. And then he talked about the World Economic Forum,
economic connections, sausage factories, fishing ports and such. But we, the
young employees of the Service, captains and majors, were sitting there and
wondering: “My God, where are we going? Doesn’t he realize that sausage
factories or fishing ports do not matter now at all; completely different
things are important that are beyond the material concept of history, beyond
the Marxist-Leninist concept”. An Idea is what always wins, and if we do not
offer an Idea but are offering just material values instead, we will only
achieve temporary solutions that are essentially failures. The same is now:
Ukraine will go nowhere, we are giving it money, selling gas; we’ll turn off
the gas – and that will be it . . .
Forgive me for the comparison, but it is the same as
if Hitler was saying: Leningrad will go nowhere; the army of the Wehrmacht will
blockade it, and the city will fall within a month. And what happened? The
people mobilized, resisted, and won. But we have to understand that an Idea can
also mobilize an enemy.
Attempts at resolving the conflicts among the nations
or the states using exclusively economic methods are doomed, that’s is why we
are losing. Instead of proposing and the idea of the unification of the Russian
world, of the resurrection of the Russian orthodox civilization that would
ensure the development and prosperity of all nations included in it, we very
often hear spiritual surrogates that oppose the 73 Soviet years to 1000 years
of the Russian history. The Great Patriotic War? Yes, we won. But is that to
say that we have never fought and won in patriotic wars before? Have we not
once expelled the occupiers from Kremlin (a reference to the expulsion from Moscow of the Polish
invaders by the People’s Militia led by Minin and Prince Pozharsky in 1612
during the Time of Troubles – translator’s note)? Similar distortions happen with other subjects.
As far as we can
judge based on the statements of the Russian politicians, a decision has been
made to keep Ukraine as is for the foreseeable future. Regardless whether the
Donbass Republics receive “the special status” or remains frozen in the status
of unrecognized states, we (the Donbass Republics – translator’s note)
unwillingly act as a factor of consolidation and support for the Ukrainian
society, sort of like a “graphite moderator” for the nuclear reactor that
prevents the nuclear reaction from getting out of control. The claimed
existence of “terrorists”, “separatists”, “Russian mercenaries” provides the
Kiev regime with the enemy image and allows to structure the Ukrainian society
in such a way, so that in less than a generation it could be transformed into
totally anti-Russian. This way, we will lose forever the opportunity to retain
it in our Russian civilization fold. If the Republics join the Russian
Federation, this “graphite moderator” would be withdrawn from the reactor,
which could trigger the processes of disintegration of Ukraine. This and not
the economic pressure or the war would allow for the informational and
diplomatic changes in our favor to take place and for the project Novorossiya
to be realized. What do you think about the possibility of conducting a
referendum in the Donbass Republics about joining Russia?
I as a Russia patriot consider such outcome the most
desirable: a referendum and reunification with Russia not only of Donbass, but
also of Transnistria. However, there is one big ‘but”. We do not exist in an
isolation, and currently Russia – many have not a slightest idea about that –
is living through a very hard period being under a powerful attack by the
globalist forces. Savvy people likely noticed that there was a period in
October-November of last year when we were a step away from a military conflict
with the United States. The President of our country is acting based on the
information we are not privy to, and thus, sees the situation differently from
how it appears to us. When I served as a head of the Analytical Division of the
Foreign Intelligence Service (FIS) – I knew what the President was reading, but
I knew only the part that was the responsibility of the FIS. Believe me, the
situation is very complex . . .
The reunification of Crimea with Russia – this, of
course, is an achievement of our President and of all those actively involved
in the operation. However, without the will of God that could have not have
happened. As a religious person, I consider this a miracle. As far as LPR/DPR
are concerned, from my own viewpoint it seems to me that it would be right to
conduct a referendum of them joining the Russian Federation. However, people at
the top have access to all the information, and, apparently, have reasons to
doubt that such a decision would be wise at this time. Would Russians be able
to cope?
We have nothing
to lose as far as sanctions or diplomatic pressure on Russia are concerned –
everything that could be done has been done. What do you think is the main
reason that does not let Russia allow the Republics to join? What prevents
this?
What prevented the DPR from taking Mariupol in 2014?
An agreement
with the oligarchs . . .
I do not know – perhaps. There was, however, a firm
position of the West. Are we truly independent financially? Obviously, we are
not. It is risky for the US and globalists to hit us in that area – it could
backfire, but they still could employ such ultimate measures. The results would
be a lot more painful for us than for them. I want to emphasize the activity of
Vladimir Putin: all these years he is slowly step by step restoring Russia’s
true independence.
Let us consider recent history. Industrialization,
which the Stalinists are so proud of, was accomplished with enormous –
material, technological, financial, and credit support of the US. Thanks to
that support, Dnepr Hydroelectric Station, Magnitka (Magnitogorsk Metal Producing Plant, built in 1932, one
of the largest in the USSR, the largest in Russia – translator’s note), Gorky Automotive Plant and thousands of other enterprises were built.
When the Great Patriotic was nearing its end, Joseph Stalin was counting on $6
billions promised by Roosevelt and was prepared to comply with the demands of
the USA: to keep the eastern European countries democratic, retain the
multi-party system or monarchies (where they existed), refrain from strict
collectivization, and to leave the church alone. Only after the Fulton speech
and the establishment of the “Iron Curtain”, the Soviet Union has altered its
foreign policy. However, the dependence remained, since the whole world existed
inside the financial-economic system dominated by the US, and we were being
incorporated into it more and more, as the socialist system created by us was
not working.
I can make a statement surprising for some and
outrageous for others: after 1917 we were never completely independent. It was
not for nothing that the West invested so much energy and resources in order to
use the “Red project” (the division of the Empire into 15 national republics)
for the destruction of the Eastern-Slavic civilization.
I remember how in 1984 or 1985 I read the telegram of
the Russian ambassador in FRG Yuliy Krivitsky about his conversation with the
Vise-Chancellor of the Western Germany, leader of the Bavarian party
Christian-Democratic Union, Joseph Straus. The latter said directly, even at
that time: “You country, Mister Ambassador, is facing difficult times. You
placed a bomb under it: 15 Republics – 15 governments, Parliaments, hymns,
flags. All this will blow up, and the Soviet Union will break down . . . “ Krivitsky objected
saying that FRG also had various lands – Saxony, Bavaria, Bremen, Hesse, etc.,
local governments, to which the Vise-Chancellor responded: “Our states are
based on the territories, but yours – on the nations”. The West understood very well, as opposed to our leadership, the main problem
of the Soviet Union and purposefully aggravated it. As a result, the Western
Ukrainians, Georgians, Armenians, and other nations remembered their national
roots, whereas only the Russian and, partially, Belorussians were transformed
into the “Soviet people” having taken to heart the myth about internationalism
and lost their historic memory.
Remember Serbs and Croats – we have the same problem
in Russia. As Joseph Broz Tito cut down the Serbian – that of the
state-defining nation – territories, the same way Joseph Stalin and his
co-conspirators cut down the Russian territories. In particular, the Russian
Novorossiya was given to the artificially created Ukraine, Ossetia – to
Georgia, the Northern and Eastern Kazakhstan populated by Russians – to Kazakhstan.
It that sense, all us Russians are somewhat circumcised, if you pardon the
expression . . .
That is why the current efforts of our President, his
heroic deeds will not be fully appreciated any time soon. His mission – to
extricate the country every year millimeter by millimeter from the national,
financial, economical and other types of traps we got caught in since 1917. Any
sudden movement, such as a referendum about incorporation of LPR/DPR could have
unintended consequences.
This is a
complex and very painful questions for all Russians. Russia is by definition a
Eurasian state; it is multinational. So, how do we ensure that the defense of
the interests of ethnic Russians would not become the instrument of the
destruction of the country under the slogans like “Stop feeding the Caucasus!”,
“Siberia – is not Moscow” and so forth. How do we find the optimal formula,
when the imperial component does not oppress but stimulates the development of
the Russian nation? It is worth remembering that the Declaration of
Independence of the Russian Federation was issued on June 12th, 1991, which predetermined the Belovezhsk conspiracy
on December 8th, 1991, and the
breakup of the USSR . . . How do we manage not
to repeat our historic mistakes?
The country could not have avoided the breakdown,
since we have divided it into the national republics. Recently we have had a
conversation with the Dagestanis-Muslims, and I recalled another conversations
with a Chechen – Major-General of the FSB and his words: “You know, Leonid
Petrovich, if they had been a White Tzar above us and Allah – we would have all
united. We love Russia, but fighting for it we do not fight for the territories
as such but for the White Tzar . . . “ This is the main factor uniting all
nations. The Dagestanis also agreed; they are also in favor of
the Empire; they understand the value of the vertical of power. There is no
difference in this issue between the Orthodoxy and Islam, and if the Empire
happens, Islam will work for it. Remember that during the Civil War the
Chechen, Ingushs, and other Caucasus people fought in the White Army.
An Empire is
impossible without the absolute monarchy . . .
Yes. However, it is too early to propose the
restoration of monarchy now. It would be a premature move. It is necessary to
clear up our minds, our memory of myths. The history of our Motherland in the
Soviet period was studied starting from 1935 – why was that? Because it was
necessary to re-write it completely, but before that new faculty had to be
trained. Then the guys from the Institute of the Red Professors invented our
history for us out of nothing under the title “The short history course of the
All Russia Communist Party of Bolsheviks” of Joseph Vissarionovich (Stalin – translator’s note).
Let us
summarize. In order for the Russian nation to prosper and maintain good
relations with other nations, we need to restore our independent state that
could only be the Russian Eurasian Empire. The Empire could only be restored as
a monarchy, but to accomplish that we need to change our mentality and to free
ourselves from the Soviet stereotypes. But here is the problem: most Russian
citizens still see in the Soviet epoch the Great Project, the Idea of Justice,
the Joy of unprecedented Victories . . . How do we alter the people’s
mentality without alienating that majority, how do we merge the best
achievements of the Soviet time with the achievements of the Tzarist period?
Middle-aged people or older cannot be changed; we need
to work with the youth. This is hard. Let me give you an example: my eldest
grand-daughter once said to me: “Grandpa, our teacher in class asked us why
Michael Romanov was elected as a Tzar (Michael Romanov, the first Tzar of the Romanov
dynasty, was elected in 1613 after the Time of Troubles, which started
following the death of the son of Ivan the Terrible, the last representative of
the Rurik dynasty, in 1598; during that period, many events took place
including the appearance of Pseudo-Dmitri claiming to be the youngest son of
Ivan the Terrible, Dmitri supposedly was killed in childhood, his ascension to
the throne in Moscow, the intervention of the Polish Army, and the final defeat
of the Poles – translator’s note), and I replied
that, first, all estates voted for him, because all wanted to have a Tzar in
the country after a horrible period of the Time of Troubles. Second, the
Russian Orthodox Church supported him, and the church had a strong influence.
And third, since he was very young, he was not involved in any of the treasons
of the Time of Troubles when the nobles switched sides in support of the Poles
or Pseudo-Dmitri”. I praised her answer but my granddaughter said that the
teacher considered her response incorrect. The response should have been as
written in the textbook, which only had one sentence about this stating that
the nobles wanted to have a young Tzar so that they could control him. That is
how contempt towards the Russian history is imprinted onto the mind of our
children. When children grow up, they will have hard time letting go of the
false concepts and accept the idea of the monarchy. Many will be torn between
the two projects imposed on us by the West – liberal and Communist.
Recall how communists and liberals (they are of the
same stock) go into hysterics when someone mentions the Third way – a special
historic role of Russia. If you simply mention, without any epithets, the name
of the last Emperor Nikolas the Second – immediately atheists, liberals,
homosexuals and other trash unite and start yelling that he was a weak Tzar, that
he “sold and destroyed Russia”. What does that say? That we are on the right
track. We do not intend to change the regime; out job is to help people
understand the lessons of the past, and when that happens, then the desire to
restore the Empire and Monarchy will become natural to them. The new
Constitution will be adopted, and the real revival of Russia will begin. But
for those who consider themselves monarchists, for all orthodox Russian people,
a Tzar has always existed, exists and will exist, and his name is – Jesus
Christ.
Leonid Petrovich Reshetnikov (b. February 6, 1947, Potsdam, Germany) — Soviet
and Russian historian, Director of the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies
(29 April 2009 to 4 January 2017), the General-the Lieutenant of the Foreign
Intelligence Service (SVR) of the Russian Federation. Candidate of
Historical Sciences. Former chief of the information-analytical staff of
the SVR in the rank of Lieutenant Genera
viernes, 7 de abril de 2017
La opinión del Coronel Baños sobre el ataque americano a Siria...merece la pena escucharle...
Probablemente el mejor analista español , merece la pena escucharle...
http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/el-coronel-banos-cree-que-el-ataque-de-eeuu-sobre-siria_2017040758e7456d0cf2abec9e0f0202.html
http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/el-coronel-banos-cree-que-el-ataque-de-eeuu-sobre-siria_2017040758e7456d0cf2abec9e0f0202.html
Bienvenido al club de los impresentables señor Trump¡¡¡
Un dia triste...Irak,Libia, Siria...¿quien será el siguiente? Mientras tanto el DAESH avanza...ya veis que cada día escribo menos y es que la tristeza no es buena para razonar y escribir...El Sr. Trump al que siempre di un voto de confianza mas allá de la campaña internacional en su contra, ha ordenado atacar a un país soberano , al unico que combate al estado islamico y nos coloca a todos a los pies de los caballos...admitiendo que esto acabe algun dia , que es mucho admitir, el despues será como Afganistan, Irak, Libia...porque por donde pasan arrasan...y no me hableis de Putin, al menos es coherente...Bienvenido al club de los impresentables señor Trump¡¡¡ y pensar que te di mi voto de confianza....
http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/el-coronel-banos-cree-que-el-ataque-de-eeuu-sobre-siria_2017040758e7456d0cf2abec9e0f0202.html
http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/el-coronel-banos-cree-que-el-ataque-de-eeuu-sobre-siria_2017040758e7456d0cf2abec9e0f0202.html
jueves, 6 de abril de 2017
martes, 4 de abril de 2017
Esto ha pasado por el momento cuando he dicho en FB que yo soy Rusia...
¿Por qué hoy no somos todos Rusia? Yo si, por supuesto.