Blogs que sigo

lunes, 1 de mayo de 2017

El problema de los todologos es que no tienen npi del Alma eslava...pero por opinar...que no quede...


Me ha costado enternderle, de hecho no lo he entendido...¿se ha leido este señor el Libro blanco de Defensa?¿Ha determinado si Putin es bueno o malo? porque despues de leerlo no lo he entendido y me temo que esto, por llamarlo de alguna forma, esotro panfleto muy bien escrito para lectores superficiales...entre lineas yo lo que veo es acojono...y el estilo me recuerda a los kompromat, articulos pagados que generan opinión o lo pretenden.....considerar a Rusia una potencia local es un grave error y una ofensa innecesaria que los eslavos no van a perdonar...


http://gaceta.es/oscar-elia/putinfilia-putinfobia-28042017-0735

viernes, 14 de abril de 2017

¿Qui prodit?

Conozco a mas de quince militares españoles de graduación alta, entre los que me incluyo,  que creen que el ataque con gas sarin en Siria es un puro montaje en el que nada tiene que ver Al Assad y hay varias razones para pensarlo así.
La primera es que con toda la comunidad internacional en contra y con la prensa mundial jugando a estrategas de pacotilla solo podría perder una guerra que va ganando...nada que ganar, mucho que perder. Del Presidente sirio se podrá decir cualquier cosa menos que es bobo...¿Que ganaría con un ataque así sobre su propia población civil?
Otra cuestión sería que las fragatas que lanzaron los misiles en represalia salieron de Rota (España y había pensado ponerlo en interrogación dadas las condiciones en que se ha alquilado esta base...) antes del supuesto ataque...
No menos cierto es la cuestión de que nadie ha podido demostrar quien ha lanzado el famoso gas, y anteriormente, hace dos años como poco, ya hubo otro ataque en el que los supuestos técnicos de la ONU tampoco pudieron determinar quien lo lanzó...
Se alude a que Turquía afirma que se trata de gas sarin y será cierto, no digo que no, pero se omite que según Siria, el gas llegó a su destino procedente de Turquía...
Si parece muy cierto que la escasa popularidad de Trump en su país le obliga a grandes golpes de efecto para retomarla en niveles semejantes a los de su elección por lo menos pero bien es cierto también que la escalada de violencia emprendida, no solo en Siria,  le pone en manos de sus halcones que a su vez son rehenes del lobby del armamento en el que lleva mucho retraso sobre Rusia porque no han podido testar en combate la eficacia a los posibles compradores, algo imprescindible en este negocio.Nadie puede vender armamento que no tiene comprobada su eficacia sobre el campo de batalla.
El único beneficiado de esta basura es el DAESH que se frota las manos viendo como sus enemigos se pelean entre ellos.¿Qui prodit?
El desquicie de Trump es tan grande como para justificar las acciones con argumentos peregrinos, eludiendo comentar que es un ataque ilegal por carecer de mandato de la ONU y hasta sus asesores, novatos ellos, llegan a matizar que ni Hitler empleó el gas contra su pueblo...¿No eran alemanes los judíos exterminados CON GAS ?
En todo esto hay algo que no consigo entender...admitiendo que la URSS  cometió grandisimos crimenes por supuesto no alcanza mi razón a entender como a Alemania y la dulce Austria se la han perdonado los suyos, no comprendo por qué a todos se les ha olvidado el genocidio armenio a manos de los turcos y un largo etc...Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresde... el napal de Vietnam ...y a los rusos nada de nada ni desde la razón ni desde la creencia de que todos los errores por crueles que sean no los deben de pagar ni todos ni mucho menos los hijos de quienes los cometieron..ni los nietos...ni los bisnietos...
Y si tan seguro está el sr. Trump de haber obrado bien ¿Por qué no quiere que se cree una comisión para investigar lo sucedido como propone Rusia?
Señor Trump acaba usted de retomar el papel de sheriff matón de sus peliculas en las que masacraron a los indigenas mientras la mayor fábrica de propaganda jamás montada, Hollywood, lo convertía todo en una epopeya y ¿sabe lo peor? que siempre creí en la bondad de los pueblos por encima de sus gobernantes con lo que muchas veces, demasiadas , los confundimos, y ya no creo...

martes, 11 de abril de 2017

Un curioso documento:la homilia del Obispo Tikhon de Yegorievsk el dia de la abdicación del Zar Nicolás II

Homélie de l’évêque Tikhon de Yegorevsk, prononcée à l’occasion de la première liturgie devant la nouvelle église des néomartyrs et confesseurs de Russie, le jour de l’abdication du tsar-martyr Nicolas II
on 17 March 2017

Nous publions ci-après in extenso l’homélie de l’évêque Tikhon de Yegorevsk, supérieur du monastère Sretensky, prononcée le 15 mars, à l’occasion de la première liturgie devant la nouvelle église des néomartyrs et confesseurs de Russie : « Nous savons que ce jour est particulier. C’est le jour où la Reine du Ciel, nous a donné le signe de Son icône « Souveraine » et a pris de façon providentielle le sceptre du pouvoir sur notre Patrie, sur la Russie, lequel est tombé des mains du dernier représentant de la dynastie tricentenaire, le saint martyr Nicolas II. Lorsque nous avons commencé à ériger cette église, nous avons prié afin que le Seigneur nous bénisse pour achever ce travail précisément ce jour, le centenaire du commencement des événements les plus tragiques, peut-être, qu’ait connu notre Patrie. C’est le commencement de ce chemin des épreuves que, par la miséricorde de Dieu, notre peuple a surmonté, ces épreuves qui ne l’ont pas brisé et qui ont amené au Christ, à la victoire de la Résurrection du Christ, les descendants de beaucoup de ceux qui, à un certain moment, avaient apostasié. L’église est dédiée à la Résurrection du Christ qui triomphe de tout, et aux fidèles disciples du Seigneur Jésus-Christ, c’est-à-dire Ses saints Néomartyrs et Confesseurs. Le Seigneur a accompli le souhait de notre cœur. Et voici qu’aujourd’hui, en cette date anniversaire, importante au moins par le fait que nous réfléchissons à la voie parcourue par notre pays et notre peuple, nous prêtons l’oreille aux leçons que nous devons tirer et nous comprenons le principal : tout se trouve dans les mains de Dieu seulement. Le Seigneur fait descendre aux enfers et en fait remonter. C’est ce qui s’est produit aussi avec notre Patrie, descendue aux enfers et remontée vers la Résurrection du Christ, la résurrection de la vie en Dieu pour des millions de nos compatriotes. Les leçons de Dieu sont parfois très lourdes. Les leçons de Dieu résident encore dans le fait que l’insouciance, la pusillanimité, l’infidélité des hommes sont supportées longtemps par Lui, mais arrive ensuite la minute lors de laquelle les plus insouciants et leurs descendants doivent expier par une épreuve amère, mais salvatrice. Nous commémorons aujourd’hui les saints Néomartyrs, mais nous ne savons pas combien il y a eu de martyrs de l’ombre, qui à un certain moment ont renié l’Église et la foi, mais grâce aux épreuves et la voie du martyre sont revenus au Christ, peut-être durant les dernières minutes. Ils sont revenus et ont découvert le sens et le but de toute leur vie, l’union avec Dieu, l’union avec le Christ. Cela s’est produit de la même façon que sur le Golgotha avec le larron : se trouvant sur la croix, il a fait au dernier moment ce qui lui était possible, il prononça de tout cœur seulement quelques mots : « Souviens-Toi de moi, Seigneur, dans Ton Royaume ». Il n’a eu dans sa vie aucun labeur spirituel, aucune piété toute sa vie durant. Seulement les péchés d’abandon, de trahison, de lâcheté et de tromperie, selon l’expression de l’empereur Nicolas Alexandrovitch. C’est la même chose que, probablement, de nombreux compatriotes pouvaient dire d’eux-mêmes : ils étaient coupables de trahison, de lâcheté et de tromperie. À l’égard de l’Église, du Seigneur, il s’agissait de la voie historique de la Russie orthodoxe, la voie qu’ils connaissaient, mais qu’ils ont négligée. Ce sont des leçons pratiques pour nous tous. Nous fêtons la gloire des saints Néomartyrs, vilipendés et rejetés par ce siècle, ridiculisés et torturés par leurs contemporains. Notre mémoire, c’est comme une sorte d’icône, ici sur terre, de ce qui se produit dans le Royaume céleste. Notre mémoire, n’est qu’un petit éclat de la gloire que ces hommes ont dans le Royaume des cieux. Ils étaient peu nombreux, mais ils avaient précisément raison, ils ont choisi précisément la véritable voie, parce qu’ils ont choisie la Voie, la Vérité et la Vie – le Christ. Malgré cela, il semblait que tout, autour d’eux, leur criait : « Quittez-Le ! Laissez-Le – et vous vivrez ». Et eux disaient autre chose : « Cherchons Dieu, et notre âme vivra » (cf. Ps. 68,33). C’est une haute leçon spirituelle. Mais il y a aussi une leçon pratique. Elle ne vient pas des saints Pères, ni des grands ascètes, elle nous est enseignée par des contemporains, qui regardaient les événements depuis l’extérieur, en 1917. L’un d’entre eux n’était pas orthodoxe, je ne sais même pas s’il était chrétien, il s’agit de l’ambassadeur de France à Petrograd, Maurice Paléologue, qui disait : « C’est étonnant, je ne connais pas d’autre peuple plus influençable que le peuple russe ». Ces gens qui saluaient le renversement de l’autocratie, convaincus de la justesse de leurs actes, s’écriaient avec enthousiasme : « Hourra ! » (c’est le mot séculier pour « Hosanna »), de même qu’ils persuadaient tous et eux-mêmes qu’enfin tout changerait, que viendraient les gens les plus dignes, que commencerait le royaume du bonheur et de la justice. Quelques mois après, les mêmes personnes étaient horrifiés et pleuraient avec des larmes de sang, parce que le pays qu’ils avaient remis eux-mêmes à ceux qui étaient les plus dignes et qui avaient été élus, s’effondrait. Vers l’été 1917 déjà, il n’y avait pratiquement plus de Russie, voilà ce qu’en ont fait ceux qui avaient frénétiquement brigué le pouvoir, qui affirmaient avec suffisance et croyaient fermement qu’ils savaient comment faire mieux. Il s’est avéré que diriger l’État russe était plus que difficile. Le pays s’effondrait et tombait dans les mains de l’antichrist, de ses précurseurs. Qui a transmis la Russie et son peuple  aux mains de ces précurseurs ? – Ceux qui aimaient infiniment la Russie, comme ils le disaient. Et il faut dire qu’ils ne mentaient pas. Tous ces acteurs du complot ignoble – et les militaires, et les aristocrates, et les membres de la douma, et l’intelligentsia, et le peuple, criaient partout : nous faisons cela pour la Russie ! Nous sommes prêts à mourir pour elle ! Et, par la suite, ils ont prouvé leur amour parfois par leur mort même, dans l’armée blanche. Mais voici qu’en définitive ce sont précisément ces gens qui aimaient infiniment la Russie qui ont livré le pays aux mains de cet homme qui a déclaré : « Mes bons messieurs, je crache sur la Russie ! » Ces mots appartiennent à celui dont le corps gît encore aujourd’hui sur la Place Rouge. Voici ce qu’ont fait, avec grand amour pour la Patrie, ceux que l’on qualifiait alors d’espoir et de meilleurs hommes du pays. Ces leçons doivent s’imprimer dans notre esprit et dans notre cœur. Nous ne pouvons permettre à nouveau quelque chose de semblable. Maintenant, Dieu merci, les conditions préalables à pareille chose sont absentes. Mais, en un clin d’œil tout peut changer si les membres de l’Église du Christ ne le sont qu’en apparence. C’est alors que l’Esprit de Dieu les quittera. Et aujourd’hui, en ce soir magnifique, remarquable, de la Table du Seigneur, prions afin que le Seigneur ne nous laisse pas entrer en tentation, qu’Il nous délivre du malin, qu’Il nous préserve, nous le petit troupeau de Son Église. Afin que dans cette église en l’honneur des Néomartyrs, souhaitée et construite par nous tous, nous puissions durant de nombreuses années célébrer la Table du Seigneur. Afin que vos enfants et vos petits-enfants la célèbrent ici. Je voudrais vous remercier tous, au nom de toute la fraternité de notre monastère, pour la prière d’aujourd’hui. Je voudrais remercier la fraternité de notre monastère elle-même pour ses labeurs, pour la construction et l’aménagement de cette église. Je voudrais exprimer des paroles de reconnaissance à tous les constructeurs, architectes, aux remarquables artistes, aux ingénieurs. Je vous remercie vous tous pour avoir pu nous permettre, par vos labeurs et vos prières, de célébrer un office aussi extraordinaire. Probablement, ce n’est pas un hasard. Le premier office, ici au Monastère Sretensky, le jour de la fête de la Rencontre du Seigneur, en 1994, s’est produit également dans la rue, nous nous en rappelons. De même, le premier office devant la nouvelle église, se déroule, non pas à dessein, mais comme les choses l’ont voulu, en plein air, dans la grande église du monde Divin, dans lequel nous vivons tous. Je voudrais remercier également le chœur et tous les étudiants, puis encore une fois, tous nos paroissiens. Que Dieu vous aide, vous renforce dans la foi, et que la Reine du Ciel vous protège. Amen ».

lunes, 10 de abril de 2017

Una interpretación sobre Ukraina del Tte. General Reshetnikov: El retorno del Imperio

Dadle al tarductor que para eso le he puesto...

General Reshetnikov: Return to the Empire (superbly controversial interview)
15339 ViewsFebruary 13, 2017 109 Comments
Foreword by the Saker:  Today I am posting a really interesting interview which will sound absolutely outlandish to a lot of you.  Get this: the person interviewed is a former KGB General who speaks about restoring the monarchy under the rule of Jesus-Christ!  And when I say “KGB General” I am being just as dishonest as the western media when it writes about Putin being a KGB officer.  Technically speaking, yes, both Putin and Reshetnikov were in the KGB and they had the little red id card which did say “KGB USSR”.  But in reality both were part of the KGB’s Foreign Intelligence Service, the First Chief Directorate (PGU) of the KGB, a completely separate branch of the KGB which even had its own, separate, headquarters in Yasenevo District in the southwest of Moscow.  The First Chief Directorate (in Russian PGU KGB SSSR) did not deal with dissent, crime, or all the other security functions of the rest of the KGB.  The PGU dealt with foreign intelligence exclusively (after the end of the Soviet Union the PGU was kept independent and renamed “SVR” or “Foreign Intelligence Service).  And it was beyond any doubt the elite, most capable, part of the KGB: only the very best were accepted there.  As for Reshetnikov, he was a top level officer responsible for an analytical Department (in Russian “Head of an informational-analytical Department”).  In other words, the guys is exceptionally intelligent and exceptionally well-educated.  One of the best analysts in Russia.  And yet he speaks of monarchy and putting Christ in power. And he lumps Communists and Liberal into one group.  How do you figure that one out?  You can dismiss him as senile, but if that is the case, his senility manifests itself in a curious way.  Besides, having seen his interviews, I can tell you that he is not senile one bit.  A clown trying to make statements to be noticed?  There are not many clowns in the PGU, even less with a rank of Lieutenant-General (that means a “three-star” general).  I won’t give you my explanation, I think that I much rather leave you with a question mark and let you ponder this weird phenomenon.  I will just say one thing: to me the views of Reshetnikov are yet another solid indicator that Russia is most definitely not part of Europe, at least not culturally.  I won’t say more :-P  Now meet our rather most interesting character!
General Reshetnikov: Return to the Empire
by Lieutenant-General Leonid Petrovich Reshetnikov
Translated by Eugenia
Donbass these days is suffering under horrific artillery fire. The Ukrainian forces are maniacally firing at Donetsk, Yasinovataya, Makeevka and other cities from MLSR and howitzers. There are many wounded; civilians are being killed, houses, schools and hospitals destroyed. This bloody spectacle is organized by the Kiev junta, which ignores all calls to stop this war, instead purposefully committing genocide of the population of the Donetsk and Lugansk Republics.
When and how will this horror end? What is the meaning of this all? What are the prospects of LPR/DPR and/or Novorossiya? And, finally, is there a way to rebuild the Great Russian Empire? We addressed these questions to the former head of the Analytic Division of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation, then the Director of the Russian Institute of Strategic Studies, a currently the President of the society “Two-Headed Eagle” – Leonid Petrovich Reshetnikov.
Q: Donetsk and other cities of Novorossiya are under fire as we speak; the Ukrainian military are attempting to breach the front at multiple points. Why now and what is the cause of this escalation of the conflict?
A: This is a planned operation. The goal of the Kiev regime is to complicate the relations between Russia and the US. Currently, the relationship between the leadership of Russia and the new leadership of the USA is generally favorable for us. Kiev is scared; it is afraid that Ukraine will no longer be of interest to the United States and personally to Trump. For that reason, everything was planned in a way that the official visit of Poroshenko to Germany had to be interrupted because of the situation in Donbass aggravated by the Ukrainian side. We cannot exclude that Merkel was a co-conspirator in this; possibly, she herself initiated that action to undermine the Russian-American negotiations. The fear of Europe is no less than the fear of Ukraine. If the relations between Russia and US improve – Europe would be left out in the cold. Thus, on the initiative of some European politicians the Kiev criminals are murdering the civilians in Donetsk and Lugansk Republics in order to attain their chimeric foreign policy goals. They are attempting by such means to save their regime, to prove their usefulness. However, they are unlikely to succeed in preventing the improvement in the relations between Russia and the US.
The Kiev scum – Poroshenko, Parubiy and others – have built such a reputations for themselves on the war against their own people that they will certainly come to a sticky end. The best option – to flee abroad, otherwise they will pay dearly. I believe the Kremlin understands perfectly that the Kiev authorities are not partners but criminals that usurped power, and no negotiations with them are possible. I want to emphasize: the Kiev regime is doomed, and no provocations, no amount of artillery fire at Donetsk and other cities, no attempts at offensives will accomplish anything for Poroshenko and Co, except yet another brand mark on the foreheads of these scoundrels.
Leonid Petrovich, you were for a long time the Head of the Russian Institute of Strategic Studies. The Institute essentially laid the theoretical groundwork for the “Project Novorossiya”, which today the authorities in Russia and Donbass republics prefer not to mention. At the same time, the ordinary Donbass people became convinced that Novorossiya will not happen, and they will end up with nothing but a territorial fragment like the two Donbass Republics. In such case – without reunification with Russia via referendum – our future looks bleak . . .
Novorossiya was not created as some theoretical project; it was born through an explosion of the Russian historic self-awareness; an explosion unexpected for all – including Moscow, the Kremlin, the Russian public. Something that is hidden in the sub-consciousness in all of us – the yearning for the recreation of the Orthodox Russian Empire. Many have not yet realized what is Novorossiya, why it created such an enthusiasm in the society and why so many people went to defend it even at the cost of their own lives. That is because the idea of the Russian unity has survived under the layer of the dead ideology of the last hundred years. Why, then, the “project Novorossiya” wound down? I believe the reason is not only that some high ranking officials disapprove of it and closed it down (although that happened, too), but the main reason is that such project cannot be based on the Red Star: then that would not be Novorossiya, the resurrection of Russia, but an imitation of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, many in the political leadership and expert community returned to the Soviet paradigms of 1970-1980s of the last century. Those paradigms have shown their ineffectiveness long ago, and attempts to reuse them now could lead to the collapse of everything. Old Soviet schemes aren’t viable but the new ones – not Soviet, but liberal – have not been taken on by the majority, so for now there is no ideological foundation for Novorossiya . . .
History is moving along a spiral; repeats are possible only on a new basis. So, at the present turn of the historic development, the spirit of Novorossiya that broke through the ideological layers had to retreat temporarily. The politicians as well as ordinary people had insufficient understanding of what NOVOROSSIYA is, where are its historical roots and what is its true spiritual meaning. I do not agree that the project is dead; it is alive and will yet return. But! Only on one condition: if we ourselves realize what path our country has travelled on for the past hundred years.
The return of LPR/DPR to Ukraine with the special status, isn’t it done for the purpose, as many suppose, to transform Ukraine from the inside, to convert it into a pro-Russian entity? What do you think the near future holds for the Republics? People that are surviving for the third years under the fire of the Ukrainian military are demanding a clear answer to this question . . .
There are different opinions in the Kremlin, but no definitive decision: to surrender Donbass to Ukraine. Yes, there are people that indeed think this way and want to do this. However, there are others that believe we should not leave people of Ukraine that have not accepted the Nazi regime to the mercy of Kiev. My personal impression: our President does not want to unconditionally surrender to Ukraine the people that lived through a war, privations and suffering, so that these people would be subjected to severe repressions, which is inevitable if Donbass is returned to Ukraine.
The problem is that Kiev shows no real changes in its treatment of Donbass or relations to the Russian Federation, and I do not see any prospects in the near future for any changes favorable to us. That regime, in spite of its rotten nature, will be persisting for some time, because there are still enough people that worked for decades to bring about such a regime; they are bound by blood; they took power and have no intentions of relinquishing it. The resistance to the regime is disorganized, lack the nationalistic Idea, not specifically Ukrainian but common for our entire huge country, our specific civilization. During the Soviet period the people were brainwashed in a special way. Everything was done to make people believe that Ukraine is an independent country.
I lived and studied in Kharkov and remember how it was. At the local level, all the time the Soviet authorities were instilling the idea: although we live in one country, but Moscow, the central Russia is somewhere far away, and we are separate, we have our own history and our own heroes. The people were taught that way – what do we expect now? It is natural that in Donbass, Odessa, Crimea and other regions Russian spirit still remains – during the 70 Soviet years and 25 years of independence the transformation has not entirely succeeded. The Russian historic self-awareness persisted, as did the feeling of belonging to the same civilization of all people that lived on the territory of the Russian Empire. All this is still there, particularly in the Eastern Ukraine. That is why the Ukrainian nationalists failed to fully accomplish their project.
Starting from 1921, forced Ukrainization of the Russian regions was taking place, specifically, of the territory of the Great Don Cossack Army and Slobozhanshchina, incorporated by the order of Lenin and Stalin into Ukraine. At some point, the town with the “romantic” name Mines (earlier Alersandrovsk-Grushevsky) and Taganrog were also given to Ukraine. Later, however, the common sense prevailed, and the towns were returned to Russia. I don’t even want to remind about Crimea gifted to Ukraine by our restless Nikita Khrushchev. Nobody really wants to remember that or think about it; everybody starts the count from 1991. My dear friends, come on! The groundwork for the breakdown of the Soviet Union was laid in 1917 and later in 1920-30s. During the Soviet time, governments, flags, hymns, national heroes were invented; monuments to open Russophobes were built. Hence the explosion. The 1991 was the result of the Soviet policies, remember that, comrades with the red stars on their cap that I have seen in LPR . . . Your ancestors, your leaders that you revere created the conditions for the breakdown of the united country. What kind of Novorossiya could you create if you do not learn lessons from history?
Leonid Petrovich, at present there two peoples in Ukraine: the first is completely anti-Russian, totally different from us in its mentality, and the second – Russian, even if the representatives of this group call themselves Ukrainians, due to upbringing and stereotypes. In reality, they are essentially deeply Russian people. The division is along the civilization-mentality lines, the same as between Serbs and Croats. Nevertheless, in the Kremlin as well as in the Moscow expert community the dominant view is that the majority of the Ukrainian population is just temporarily misled, brainwashed by the propaganda. That is to say, we will use political technologies to break the spell; they will again recall that they are Russians – and everything will be peaceful like it was before. But at least half of the Ukrainian population has long time ago turned into a different nation. What do we do with them, how do we reconcile irreconcilable differences?
As a former (until 1974) resident of Ukraine, I generally agree with you opinion. That division existed even then: when you cross Dnepr river, on the other bank not everyone, but the majority looked like a different nation. The wife of my elder brother from the Poltava region and speaking the Malorossian dialect (the Poltava region, a part of historic Malorossiya, is on the left bank of the Dnepr neighboring the Kharkov and Dneptopetrovsk regions; Malorossiya (Poltava, Chernigov, Kirovograd), or Small Russia, together with Novorossiya (Odessa, Nikolaev, Kherson, Donbass) or New Russia, and Sloboshanshchina (Kharkov region), are historic names for territories of the Eastern Ukraine; in the Soviet period, the Poltava dialect was taken as a foundation for the development of the standard Ukrainian language – translator’s note) used to say about the speech of the people from the trans-Dnepr region: ”I do not understand their nice language. . . “ She is saying the same thing now. I agree that the inhabitants of the Western Ukraine were strongly influenced mentally and religiously by the Uniate and Catholic religions. Apparently, the fact that genetically the Western Ukrainians are linked to the leftovers of the Khazar Khanate also plays a significant role. Their mentality has a complex origin, and indeed today they are largely a different nation, although among them there are still people close to us in spirit. After all, the Russianness is not determined by the blood but by the mindset. Possibly, in the future there will be two different territories, two different states for these two peoples.
At his time, the Foreign Minister of the Russian Empire Khvostov wrote to the Tzar that Galicia should not be included into the Empire, since it was a completely alien element. Thus, the awareness of the deep difference was present then, and that difference should be taken into account in the future. It seems, they are a different nation. Croats and Serbs come to mind: there is little difference between the Serbian and Croatian languages – 100-200 words and slightly different pronunciation of a few sounds, which means this is essentially the same language. However, the mental differences make them two different nations, as do the difference in religion – Catholics and Orthodox – and in the origin and development of these nations.
That is why it is important to realize that we will not be able to rid them from the illusions – they are a different nation. Although some do, I repeat, harbor delusions in that regard – Kremlin is large, there are people with diverse opinions there, but there are also people who understand perfectly that two distinct nations inhabit the present day Ukraine.
We have to understand that the problem cannot be solved in one or two-three years; this is a long-term problem. The opportunities for working with the population of the Western Ukraine, the southern regions of Malorossiya are extensive. I am convinced that the “project Novorossiya” will be revived – this is our historic, spiritual project. In order to prevent that project from developing further, an unexpected weapon is currently employed – an imitation of the Soviet project.
You mean the idea embraced by some political analysts that “we in the end will return the whole of Ukraine”?
No, I speak about Novorossya proper, the eight South-Eastern regions of the present day Ukraine. Whatever idea someone embraces – it’s his business. In the leadership of our country and in the government there are enough people who understand that realistically we could only think about the project Novorossiya. To return the entire Ukraine – this is a fairy tale. Such idea shows either a total lack of understanding of the real processes or a disinclination to work towards a realistic goal justifying the inaction by the assertion that some day we will accomplish a much grander task of getting back the whole of Ukraine.
People that have still failed to understand what was happening with us during 73 years should not feel offended. These are all the rudiments of the Soviet style of thinking when the national factor was neglected, and as a result we got outbreaks of nationalism/separatism all over the territory of our civilization. I remember two main Soviet postulates. In 1988, when I was a junior official, I was delivering a talk to the leadership of the Foreign Intelligence Service, and the Chief of the Service Vladimir Aleksandrovich Kryutchkov said to me: “The Baltic countries will never get away from us, because . . . “. And then he talked about the World Economic Forum, economic connections, sausage factories, fishing ports and such. But we, the young employees of the Service, captains and majors, were sitting there and wondering: “My God, where are we going? Doesn’t he realize that sausage factories or fishing ports do not matter now at all; completely different things are important that are beyond the material concept of history, beyond the Marxist-Leninist concept”. An Idea is what always wins, and if we do not offer an Idea but are offering just material values instead, we will only achieve temporary solutions that are essentially failures. The same is now: Ukraine will go nowhere, we are giving it money, selling gas; we’ll turn off the gas – and that will be it . . .
Forgive me for the comparison, but it is the same as if Hitler was saying: Leningrad will go nowhere; the army of the Wehrmacht will blockade it, and the city will fall within a month. And what happened? The people mobilized, resisted, and won. But we have to understand that an Idea can also mobilize an enemy.
Attempts at resolving the conflicts among the nations or the states using exclusively economic methods are doomed, that’s is why we are losing. Instead of proposing and the idea of the unification of the Russian world, of the resurrection of the Russian orthodox civilization that would ensure the development and prosperity of all nations included in it, we very often hear spiritual surrogates that oppose the 73 Soviet years to 1000 years of the Russian history. The Great Patriotic War? Yes, we won. But is that to say that we have never fought and won in patriotic wars before? Have we not once expelled the occupiers from Kremlin (a reference to the expulsion from Moscow of the Polish invaders by the People’s Militia led by Minin and Prince Pozharsky in 1612 during the Time of Troubles – translator’s note)? Similar distortions happen with other subjects.
As far as we can judge based on the statements of the Russian politicians, a decision has been made to keep Ukraine as is for the foreseeable future. Regardless whether the Donbass Republics receive “the special status” or remains frozen in the status of unrecognized states, we (the Donbass Republics – translator’s note) unwillingly act as a factor of consolidation and support for the Ukrainian society, sort of like a “graphite moderator” for the nuclear reactor that prevents the nuclear reaction from getting out of control. The claimed existence of “terrorists”, “separatists”, “Russian mercenaries” provides the Kiev regime with the enemy image and allows to structure the Ukrainian society in such a way, so that in less than a generation it could be transformed into totally anti-Russian. This way, we will lose forever the opportunity to retain it in our Russian civilization fold. If the Republics join the Russian Federation, this “graphite moderator” would be withdrawn from the reactor, which could trigger the processes of disintegration of Ukraine. This and not the economic pressure or the war would allow for the informational and diplomatic changes in our favor to take place and for the project Novorossiya to be realized. What do you think about the possibility of conducting a referendum in the Donbass Republics about joining Russia?
I as a Russia patriot consider such outcome the most desirable: a referendum and reunification with Russia not only of Donbass, but also of Transnistria. However, there is one big ‘but”. We do not exist in an isolation, and currently Russia – many have not a slightest idea about that – is living through a very hard period being under a powerful attack by the globalist forces. Savvy people likely noticed that there was a period in October-November of last year when we were a step away from a military conflict with the United States. The President of our country is acting based on the information we are not privy to, and thus, sees the situation differently from how it appears to us. When I served as a head of the Analytical Division of the Foreign Intelligence Service (FIS) – I knew what the President was reading, but I knew only the part that was the responsibility of the FIS. Believe me, the situation is very complex . . .
The reunification of Crimea with Russia – this, of course, is an achievement of our President and of all those actively involved in the operation. However, without the will of God that could have not have happened. As a religious person, I consider this a miracle. As far as LPR/DPR are concerned, from my own viewpoint it seems to me that it would be right to conduct a referendum of them joining the Russian Federation. However, people at the top have access to all the information, and, apparently, have reasons to doubt that such a decision would be wise at this time. Would Russians be able to cope?
We have nothing to lose as far as sanctions or diplomatic pressure on Russia are concerned – everything that could be done has been done. What do you think is the main reason that does not let Russia allow the Republics to join? What prevents this?
What prevented the DPR from taking Mariupol in 2014?
An agreement with the oligarchs . . .
I do not know – perhaps. There was, however, a firm position of the West. Are we truly independent financially? Obviously, we are not. It is risky for the US and globalists to hit us in that area – it could backfire, but they still could employ such ultimate measures. The results would be a lot more painful for us than for them. I want to emphasize the activity of Vladimir Putin: all these years he is slowly step by step restoring Russia’s true independence.
Let us consider recent history. Industrialization, which the Stalinists are so proud of, was accomplished with enormous – material, technological, financial, and credit support of the US. Thanks to that support, Dnepr Hydroelectric Station, Magnitka (Magnitogorsk Metal Producing Plant, built in 1932, one of the largest in the USSR, the largest in Russia – translator’s note), Gorky Automotive Plant and thousands of other enterprises were built. When the Great Patriotic was nearing its end, Joseph Stalin was counting on $6 billions promised by Roosevelt and was prepared to comply with the demands of the USA: to keep the eastern European countries democratic, retain the multi-party system or monarchies (where they existed), refrain from strict collectivization, and to leave the church alone. Only after the Fulton speech and the establishment of the “Iron Curtain”, the Soviet Union has altered its foreign policy. However, the dependence remained, since the whole world existed inside the financial-economic system dominated by the US, and we were being incorporated into it more and more, as the socialist system created by us was not working.
I can make a statement surprising for some and outrageous for others: after 1917 we were never completely independent. It was not for nothing that the West invested so much energy and resources in order to use the “Red project” (the division of the Empire into 15 national republics) for the destruction of the Eastern-Slavic civilization.
I remember how in 1984 or 1985 I read the telegram of the Russian ambassador in FRG Yuliy Krivitsky about his conversation with the Vise-Chancellor of the Western Germany, leader of the Bavarian party Christian-Democratic Union, Joseph Straus. The latter said directly, even at that time: “You country, Mister Ambassador, is facing difficult times. You placed a bomb under it: 15 Republics – 15 governments, Parliaments, hymns, flags. All this will blow up, and the Soviet Union will break down . . . “ Krivitsky objected saying that FRG also had various lands – Saxony, Bavaria, Bremen, Hesse, etc., local governments, to which the Vise-Chancellor responded: “Our states are based on the territories, but yours – on the nations”. The West understood very well, as opposed to our leadership, the main problem of the Soviet Union and purposefully aggravated it. As a result, the Western Ukrainians, Georgians, Armenians, and other nations remembered their national roots, whereas only the Russian and, partially, Belorussians were transformed into the “Soviet people” having taken to heart the myth about internationalism and lost their historic memory.
Remember Serbs and Croats – we have the same problem in Russia. As Joseph Broz Tito cut down the Serbian – that of the state-defining nation – territories, the same way Joseph Stalin and his co-conspirators cut down the Russian territories. In particular, the Russian Novorossiya was given to the artificially created Ukraine, Ossetia – to Georgia, the Northern and Eastern Kazakhstan populated by Russians – to Kazakhstan. It that sense, all us Russians are somewhat circumcised, if you pardon the expression . . .
That is why the current efforts of our President, his heroic deeds will not be fully appreciated any time soon. His mission – to extricate the country every year millimeter by millimeter from the national, financial, economical and other types of traps we got caught in since 1917. Any sudden movement, such as a referendum about incorporation of LPR/DPR could have unintended consequences.
This is a complex and very painful questions for all Russians. Russia is by definition a Eurasian state; it is multinational. So, how do we ensure that the defense of the interests of ethnic Russians would not become the instrument of the destruction of the country under the slogans like “Stop feeding the Caucasus!”, “Siberia – is not Moscow” and so forth. How do we find the optimal formula, when the imperial component does not oppress but stimulates the development of the Russian nation? It is worth remembering that the Declaration of Independence of the Russian Federation was issued on June 12th, 1991, which predetermined the Belovezhsk conspiracy on December 8th, 1991, and the breakup of the USSR . . . How do we manage not to repeat our historic mistakes?
The country could not have avoided the breakdown, since we have divided it into the national republics. Recently we have had a conversation with the Dagestanis-Muslims, and I recalled another conversations with a Chechen – Major-General of the FSB and his words: “You know, Leonid Petrovich, if they had been a White Tzar above us and Allah – we would have all united. We love Russia, but fighting for it we do not fight for the territories as such but for the White Tzar . . . “ This is the main factor uniting all nations. The Dagestanis also agreed; they are also in favor of the Empire; they understand the value of the vertical of power. There is no difference in this issue between the Orthodoxy and Islam, and if the Empire happens, Islam will work for it. Remember that during the Civil War the Chechen, Ingushs, and other Caucasus people fought in the White Army.
An Empire is impossible without the absolute monarchy . . .
Yes. However, it is too early to propose the restoration of monarchy now. It would be a premature move. It is necessary to clear up our minds, our memory of myths. The history of our Motherland in the Soviet period was studied starting from 1935 – why was that? Because it was necessary to re-write it completely, but before that new faculty had to be trained. Then the guys from the Institute of the Red Professors invented our history for us out of nothing under the title “The short history course of the All Russia Communist Party of Bolsheviks” of Joseph Vissarionovich (Stalin – translator’s note).
Let us summarize. In order for the Russian nation to prosper and maintain good relations with other nations, we need to restore our independent state that could only be the Russian Eurasian Empire. The Empire could only be restored as a monarchy, but to accomplish that we need to change our mentality and to free ourselves from the Soviet stereotypes. But here is the problem: most Russian citizens still see in the Soviet epoch the Great Project, the Idea of Justice, the Joy of unprecedented Victories . . . How do we alter the people’s mentality without alienating that majority, how do we merge the best achievements of the Soviet time with the achievements of the Tzarist period?
Middle-aged people or older cannot be changed; we need to work with the youth. This is hard. Let me give you an example: my eldest grand-daughter once said to me: “Grandpa, our teacher in class asked us why Michael Romanov was elected as a Tzar (Michael Romanov, the first Tzar of the Romanov dynasty, was elected in 1613 after the Time of Troubles, which started following the death of the son of Ivan the Terrible, the last representative of the Rurik dynasty, in 1598; during that period, many events took place including the appearance of Pseudo-Dmitri claiming to be the youngest son of Ivan the Terrible, Dmitri supposedly was killed in childhood, his ascension to the throne in Moscow, the intervention of the Polish Army, and the final defeat of the Poles – translator’s note), and I replied that, first, all estates voted for him, because all wanted to have a Tzar in the country after a horrible period of the Time of Troubles. Second, the Russian Orthodox Church supported him, and the church had a strong influence. And third, since he was very young, he was not involved in any of the treasons of the Time of Troubles when the nobles switched sides in support of the Poles or Pseudo-Dmitri”. I praised her answer but my granddaughter said that the teacher considered her response incorrect. The response should have been as written in the textbook, which only had one sentence about this stating that the nobles wanted to have a young Tzar so that they could control him. That is how contempt towards the Russian history is imprinted onto the mind of our children. When children grow up, they will have hard time letting go of the false concepts and accept the idea of the monarchy. Many will be torn between the two projects imposed on us by the West – liberal and Communist.
Recall how communists and liberals (they are of the same stock) go into hysterics when someone mentions the Third way – a special historic role of Russia. If you simply mention, without any epithets, the name of the last Emperor Nikolas the Second – immediately atheists, liberals, homosexuals and other trash unite and start yelling that he was a weak Tzar, that he “sold and destroyed Russia”. What does that say? That we are on the right track. We do not intend to change the regime; out job is to help people understand the lessons of the past, and when that happens, then the desire to restore the Empire and Monarchy will become natural to them. The new Constitution will be adopted, and the real revival of Russia will begin. But for those who consider themselves monarchists, for all orthodox Russian people, a Tzar has always existed, exists and will exist, and his name is – Jesus Christ.

Leonid Petrovich Reshetnikov (b. February 6, 1947, Potsdam, Germany) — Soviet and Russian historian, Director of the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies (29 April 2009 to 4 January 2017), the General-the Lieutenant of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) of the Russian Federation.  Candidate of Historical Sciences.  Former chief of the information-analytical staff of the SVR in the rank of Lieutenant Genera

viernes, 7 de abril de 2017

Un romántico reportaje sobre los amores ruso-españoles...

La opinión del Coronel Baños sobre el ataque americano a Siria...merece la pena escucharle...

Bienvenido al club de los impresentables señor Trump¡¡¡

Un dia triste...Irak,Libia, Siria...¿quien será el siguiente? Mientras tanto el DAESH avanza...ya veis que cada día escribo menos y es que la tristeza no es buena para razonar y escribir...El Sr. Trump al que siempre di un voto de confianza mas allá de la campaña internacional en su contra, ha ordenado atacar a un país soberano , al unico que combate al estado islamico y nos coloca a todos a los pies de los caballos...admitiendo que esto acabe algun dia , que es mucho admitir, el despues será como Afganistan, Irak, Libia...porque por donde pasan arrasan...y no me hableis de Putin, al menos es coherente...Bienvenido al club de los impresentables señor Trump¡¡¡ y pensar que te di mi voto de confianza....
http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/el-coronel-banos-cree-que-el-ataque-de-eeuu-sobre-siria_2017040758e7456d0cf2abec9e0f0202.html

martes, 4 de abril de 2017

Esto ha pasado por el momento cuando he dicho en FB que yo soy Rusia...


CUANDO CONVERTINOS Y CLASIFICAMOS A LOS MUERTOS POR CATEGORIAS NO ESTAMOS CONSTRUYENDO UN MUNDO MEJOR...





Rafael Gonzalez Crespo
12 h
¿Por qué hoy no somos todos Rusia? Yo si, por supuesto.
Comentarios
Responder
1
12 horas
Begoña Alonso Pintado Mi coronel usted sabe que le sigo
Responder
1
12 horas
Lucia Feliu Rossello Yo,también!!!he estado unos 20mn buscando un lazo con la bandera rusa o otro símbolo de duelo relacionado con Rusia o san Petersburgo y no ha habido manera
Responder
1
12 horas
Raisa Semenova Garrosca Pues porque si fuéramos todos Rusia, entonces seríamos pro-rusos... Y eso está muy mal visto!!!
Responder
1
12 horas
Lilia Ligoz gracias
Responder
1
12 horas
Pedro González Ranz Yo estoy esperando la respuesta de Putin. Tiene todo mi apoyo.
Responder
1
12 horas
Isabel Gomez Oñoro Putin estaba en hoy en san Petersburgo. Tenía una reunión con el presidente de Bielorusia. Así que el ataque no ha sido por casualidad.
Responder
2
12 horas
Lucia Feliu Rossello Me la quedo
Responder
1
12 horas
Ilde Rojas Y yo
Responder
1
12 horas
Jose Fernando González Rodríguez ¿En que quedamos Pedro?
Responder
1
12 horas
Belen Collado Yo también
Responder
1
12 horas
Manuela Leiva Tienes toda la razón, Rafael; aquí lamentamos los muertos muy selectivamente.
Responder
1
12 horas
Santiago Eguren Secades Sí señor! Pobres!!
Responder
1
12 horas
Luis Diego Y yo también!
Responder
1
12 horas
Pedro Vicente García Romero Todo el apoyo a la población de Rusia
Responder
1
12 horas
Marín Bello El veneno que se inocula cada día tiene sus efectos.A ver cuándo se enteran algúnos de que la mitad de Europa es territorio ruso.No de Putin ni de nadie,ruso.Y con casi 150 millones de seres humanos que jamás nos han hecho nada,ni nos han arrebatado Cubas,Puertos Ricos y Filipinas,ni han invadido España,ni nos han arrebatado y nos siguen arrebatando una parte del solar patrio.
Responder
6
12 horasEditado
Rocio Municio A mi me ha dado la misma pena que con cualquiera que le pase esto . Tambien creo que ya 10 nos llegan a parecer pocos nos estamos inmunizando a dolor ajeno 😓
Responder
1
12 horas
Rocio Municio Vaya por dios ...
Responder
1
12 horas
Juanamari Martinez Baños Por que somos hipócritas
Responder
1
12 horas
Jose Manuel Magro Ferreiro Estoy con Rusia
Responder
1
12 horas
Raul Revuelta Fuentes Pues es cierto, parece que si no nos toca cerca no va con nosotros.. cada día esto pasa en muchos países y no lloramos igual
Responder
1
12 horas
Cati Guerrero Yo tambien
Responder
1
11 horas
Han Jana Y yo....😭
Responder
1
11 horas
Delia Sanchez Rodriguez con su permiso, comparto
Responder
1
8 horas
Mari Carmen Monteverde ¡¡¡AFIRMATIVO!!!
¡¡¡ABSOLUTAMENTE DE ACUERDO!!!
Responder
1
9 horas
Malenita Gro NARANJAS AMI ME AGRADA SER MEXICANA Y A MUCHO ORGULLO
Gusti de Sama Por el cinismo de la progresía que si son musulmanes y venezolanos.
Responder
1
4 horas
Responder
1
3 horas
Bartolome Serra Massanet Y yo, sin contemplaciones con los terroristas.
Responder
1
2 horas
Richy Rico Vallens Porque como Rusia no está en Europa no cuenta, son así de hipocritas
Responder
1
27 minEditado
Ángel Vega Madrazo El sábado la coral de la catedral de San Petersburgo nos ofreció un magnífico concierto, hoy toca solidarizarse con ellos y con todo el pueblo ruso que está sufriendo la barbarie de unos descerebrados.
Yayo Älvarez Brú Russians forever.....Ver traducción
Vicèns Cañelles Yo siempre he condenado toda clase de violencia y/o agresiones, en especial las de cualquiera que intente sembrar el terror y las <gratuitas>, en estas incluyo todas las domesticas y/o familiares, sin distincion de sexo o parentesco, por lo cual digo YO SOY USA, YO SOY ESPAÑA, YO SOY FRANCIA, YO SOY BELGICA, YO SOY RUSIA, YO SOY ...
Responder
2
43 min
Fernando Marquez Chinchilla Yo lo soy a diario.